@node Templates @chapter The Template Implementation @cindex templates @cindex function templates @cindex class templates @cindex parameterized types @cindex types, parameterized The C++ template@footnote{Class templates are also known as @dfn{parameterized types}.} facility, which effectively allows use of variables for types in declarations, is one of the newest features of the language. @sc{gnu} C++ is one of the first compilers to implement many of the template facilities currently defined by the @sc{ansi} committee. Nevertheless, the template implementation is not yet complete. This chapter maps the current limitations of the @sc{gnu} C++ template implementation. @menu * Template limitations:: Limitations for function and class templates * Function templates:: Limitations for function templates * Class templates:: Limitations for class templates * Template debugging:: Debugging information for templates @end menu @node Template limitations @section Limitations for function and class templates @cindex template limitations @cindex template bugs @cindex bugs, templates These limitations apply to any use of templates (function templates or class templates) with @sc{gnu} C++: @table @emph @item Template definitions must be visible When you compile code with templates, the template definitions must come first (before the compiler needs to expand them), and template definitions you use must be visible in the current scope. @c FIXME! Is this a defined property of templates, rather than a @c temporary limitation? @c ANSWER: It's a limitation, but it's hard to say why it's a limitation @c to someone. We need an infinite link-cycle, in one camp, to @c accomplish things so you don't need the template definitions around. @cindex static data in template classes @cindex template classes, static data in @item Individual initializers needed for static data Templates for static data in template classes do not work. @xref{Class templates,,Limitations for class templates}. @end table @node Function templates @section Limitations for function templates @cindex function template limitations Function templates are implemented for the most part. The compiler can correctly determine template parameter values, and will delay instantiation of a function that uses templates until the requisite type information is available. @noindent The following limitations remain: @itemize @bullet @cindex template vs declaration, functions @cindex declaration vs template, functions @cindex function declaration vs template @item Narrowed specification: function declarations should not prevent template expansion. When you declare a function, @sc{gnu} C++ interprets the declaration as an indication that you will provide a definition for that function. Therefore, @sc{gnu} C++ does not use a template expansion if there is also an applicable declaration. @sc{gnu} C++ only expands the template when there is no such declaration. The specification in Bjarne Stroustrup's @cite{The C++ Programming Language, Second Edition} is narrower, and the @sc{gnu} C++ implementation is now clearly incorrect. With this new specification, a declaration that corresponds to an instantiation of a function template only affects whether conversions are needed to use that version of the function. It should no longer prevent expansion of the template definition. For example, this code fragment must be treated differently: @smallexample template X min (X& x1, X& x2) @{ @dots{} @} int min (int, int); @dots{} int i; short s; min (i, s); // @r{should call} min(int,int) // @r{derived from template} @dots{} @end smallexample @item The compiler does not yet understand function signatures where types are nested within template parameters. For example, a function like the following produces a syntax error on the closing @samp{)} of the definition of the function @code{f}: @smallexample template class A @{ public: T x; class Y @{@}; @}; template int f (A::Y y) @{ @dots{} @} @end smallexample @cindex @code{inline} and function templates @cindex function templates and @code{inline} @item If you declare an @code{inline} function using templates, the compiler can only inline the code @emph{after} the first time you use that function with whatever particular type signature the template was instantiated. Removing this limitation is akin to supporting nested function definitions in @sc{gnu} C++; the limitation will probably remain until the more general problem of nested functions is solved. @item All the @emph{method} templates (templates for member functions) for a class must be visible to the compiler when the class template is instantiated. @end itemize @node Class templates @section Limitations for class templates @cindex class template limitations @ignore FIXME!! Include a comprehensible version of this if someone can explain it. (Queried Brendan and Raeburn w/full orig context, 26may1993---pesch) - [RHP: I don't understand what the following fragment refers to. If it's the "BIG BUG" section in the original, why does it say "overriding class declarations" here when the more detailed text refers to *function* declarations? Here's the fragment I don't understand:] there are problems with user-supplied overriding class declarations (see below). @end ignore @itemize @bullet @ignore @cindex static data, not working in templates @item Templates for static data in template classes do not work. Currently, you must initialize each case of such data individually. @c FIXME!! Brendan to see if still true. @c ANSWER: This section presumes that it's incorrect to have to @c initialize for each type you instantiate with. It's not, it's the @c right way to do it. @end ignore Unfortunately, individual initializations of this sort are likely to be considered errors eventually; since they're needed now, you might want to flag places where you use them with comments to mark the need for a future transition. @cindex nested type results vs templates @item Member functions in template classes may not have results of nested type; @sc{gnu} C++ signals a syntax error on the attempt. The following example illustrates this problem with an @code{enum} type @code{alph}: @smallexample template class list @{ @dots{} enum alph @{a,b,c@}; alph bar(); @dots{} @}; template list::alph list::bar() // @i{Syntax error here} @{ @dots{} @} @end smallexample @cindex preprocessor conditionals in templates @cindex conditionals (preprocessor) in templates @item A parsing bug makes it difficult to use preprocessor conditionals within templates. For example, in this code: @smallexample template class list @{ @dots{} #ifdef SYSWRONG T x; #endif @dots{} @} @end smallexample The preprocessor output leaves sourcefile line number information (lines like @samp{# 6 "foo.cc"} when it expands the @code{#ifdef} block. These lines confuse the compiler while parsing templates, giving a syntax error. If you cannot avoid preprocessor conditionals in templates, you can suppress the line number information using the @samp{-P} preprocessor option (but this will make debugging more difficult), by compiling the affected modules like this: @smallexample g++ -P foo.cc -o foo @end smallexample @cindex parsing errors, templates @item Parsing errors are reported when templates are first @emph{instantiated}---not on the template definition itself. In particular, if you do not instantiate a template definition at all, the compiler never reports any parsing errors that may be in the template definition. @end itemize @node Template debugging @section Debugging information for templates @cindex templates and debugging information @cindex debugging information and templates Debugging information for templates works for some object code formats, but not others. It works for stabs@footnote{Except that insufficient debugging information for methods of template classes is generated in stabs.} (used primarily in @sc{a.out} object code, but also in the Solaris 2 version of @sc{elf}), and the @sc{mips} version of @sc{coff} debugging format. @sc{dwarf} support is currently minimal, and requires further development.