Ticket #1092 (closed defect: fixed)

Opened 10 years ago

Last modified 7 years ago

Package PyAFS whether it's a good idea or not

Reported by: jdreed Owned by:
Priority: normal Milestone: The Distant Future
Component: -- Keywords:
Cc: Fixed in version: python-afs 0.2.2
Upstream bug:

Description

Because of #395 and #227 and probably more.

Change History

comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by jdreed

Someone who understands more about the challenges of doing this (mumble APIs mumble) should speak up and either explain what is needed, or wontfix it and I'll just use subprocess in the nautilus-afs prefpane, which I'm rewriting for Gtk3

comment:2 Changed 8 years ago by jdreed

Both Scripts and XVM have packaged it. We should snapshot their sources or something. We should also make an effort not to diverge from each other.

comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by jdreed

  • Status changed from new to development

Zephyr determined there's probably no good reason not to do this.

comment:4 Changed 7 years ago by jdreed

As long as we're doing this, let's release a new version:
 https://github.com/mit-athena/python-afs/pull/1

comment:5 Changed 7 years ago by jdreed

  • Status changed from development to review

comment:6 Changed 7 years ago by jdreed

  • Status changed from review to committed

comment:7 Changed 7 years ago by jdreed

  • Status changed from committed to development
  • Fixed in version set to python-afs 0.2.0-1

After some small fixups ( c1dbb2ff...0b24cc00), this is now in -dev

comment:8 Changed 7 years ago by jdreed

  • Status changed from development to proposed
  • Fixed in version changed from python-afs 0.2.0-1 to python-afs 0.2.2

comment:9 Changed 7 years ago by jdreed

  • Status changed from proposed to closed
  • Resolution set to fixed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.