Ticket #766 (assigned defect)
debathena-pyhesiodfs should stop using macathena as an upstream
Reported by: | kaduk | Owned by: | jdreed |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | trivial | Milestone: | The Distant Future |
Component: | -- | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Fixed in version: | ||
Upstream bug: |
Description
And get rid of that ugly 0.0 version number
So sayeth geofft (and I can't check if we have another ticket right now).
Change History
comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by jdreed
I think geofft mainly objects to the version number. Forking is probably stupid, but I see three potential solutions:
- Macathena and Debathena come to an amicable resolution whereby it moves to Debathena as upstream
- Macathena and Debathena work together to come up with a neutral "SIPB" repo where stuff like this can live (and things like nss_nonlocal can joint it)
- Stop caring
comment:3 Changed 11 years ago by jdreed
- Status changed from new to assigned
- Owner set to achernya
achernya apparently talked to quentin about this?
comment:4 Changed 11 years ago by jdreed
- Owner changed from achernya to jdreed
OK, the long awaited rewrite of pyhesiodfs for locker support. This can be deployed ~now, so that it can be in place for the liblocker rewrite.
Available for pre-review on the 'jdreed' branch of my github clone ( https://github.com/jdreed/pyhesiodfs/tree/jdreed)
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
By which you mean you want to fork it? That seems silly.