Ticket #1092 (closed defect: fixed)
Package PyAFS whether it's a good idea or not
| Reported by: | jdreed | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | The Distant Future |
| Component: | -- | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Fixed in version: | python-afs 0.2.2 | |
| Upstream bug: |
Change History
comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by jdreed
Both Scripts and XVM have packaged it. We should snapshot their sources or something. We should also make an effort not to diverge from each other.
comment:3 Changed 11 years ago by jdreed
- Status changed from new to development
Zephyr determined there's probably no good reason not to do this.
comment:4 Changed 11 years ago by jdreed
As long as we're doing this, let's release a new version:
https://github.com/mit-athena/python-afs/pull/1
comment:6 Changed 11 years ago by jdreed
- Status changed from review to committed
Committed as fbe098de through a11a347f
comment:7 Changed 11 years ago by jdreed
- Status changed from committed to development
- Fixed in version set to python-afs 0.2.0-1
After some small fixups ( c1dbb2ff...0b24cc00), this is now in -dev
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Someone who understands more about the challenges of doing this (mumble APIs mumble) should speak up and either explain what is needed, or wontfix it and I'll just use subprocess in the nautilus-afs prefpane, which I'm rewriting for Gtk3