Custom Query (1145 matches)
Results (190 - 192 of 1145)
| Ticket | Resolution | Summary | Owner | Reporter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #456 | fixed | Maintainer for debathenified packages should be Debathena | broder | broder |
| Description |
For reasons more or less identical to those in < https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField>, when we modify somebody else's package, we should stick our name on it and not theirs. The debathenificator should be able to move the Maintainer field to XSBC-Original-Maintainer, and put us down as the Maintainer. We're actually only using the debathenificator framework for lprng right now, making it the only package affected by this, but we should be sure to bump its version number and rebuild when we fix this. |
|||
| #458 | wontfix | Non-BSD CUPS clients should choose the correct server | broder | |
| Description |
Apparently the BSD-style commands (lpr, lpq, lprm, lpc) are being phased out with CUPS in favor of the SysV-style commands (lp, lpstat, cancel, etc). If that's the case, we're probably going to want to eventually transition to teaching and using the SysV commands, which means they're going to need to be able to deal with our multi-server configuration. Specifically, we probably want to add wrapper scripts for:
We probably don't care about wrapper scripts for:
|
|||
| #481 | fixed | Upgrade debhelper compatibility level | broder | |
| Description |
Now that Sarge is gone, we no longer need to declare a debhelper compatibility level of 4. Furthermore, we probably shouldn't, and there are probably places where we're not actually compatible with dh 4. So long as Etch and Hardy are still around, we can only bump it to 5. But we probably should do so anyway. |
|||
